Legal Opinion

Energy Development Corp. v. Moss

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided January 8, 2004No. 31238PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MCGRAW, Justice.

The parties in this appeal contest the ownership of what is called “coalbed methane,” which many refer to simply as “CBM.” Coalbed methane, as its name suggests, originates in a coal seam. Traditionally viewed as a dangerous waste product of coal mining, *580in more recent years coalbed methane has emerged as a useful, and thus valuable, source of energy. The specific question asked in this case is whether a standard oil and gas lease executed in 1986 conveyed to the lessee the right to drill into the lessor’s coal seams in order to produce the coalbed methane. This is the only…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Williams v. Precision Coil, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Carbon County v. Union Reserve Coal Co., Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Public Citizen, Inc. v. First National Bank in FairmontWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Cotiga Development Co. v. United Fuel Gas Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Watt v. Western Nuclear, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Perrine v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Gerald Corder v. Antero Resources CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2023
  3. Perrine v. EI DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND CO.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Citynet, LLC v. Ray ToneyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Harrison-Wyatt, LLC v. RatliffSupreme Court of Virginia · 2004

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API