Legal Opinion

David William Knarr v. Heidi Sternhagen

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided September 1, 2026No. 6:26-cv-01412Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON EUGENE DIVISION DAVID WILLIAM KNARR, Case No. 6:26-cv-01412-MTK Plaintiff, OPINION AND ORDER v. HEIDI STERNHAGEN, Defendant. KASUBHAI, United States District Judge: Self-Represented Plaintiff David William Knarr (“Plaintiff”) filed this lawsuit on July 10, 2026, and applied to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). For the reasons below, Plaintiff’s motion to proceed IFP (ECF No. 2) is GRANTED; however, the Clerk of the Court shall not issue process because Plaintiff’s Complaint (ECF No. 1) is DISMISSED with prejudice. BACKGROUND Plaintiff brings…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API