Legal Opinion

United States v. Mandujano

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 19, 1976No. 74-754Published

1Opinion of the Court

425 U.S. 564 (1976)

UNITED STATES

v.

MANDUJANO.

No. 74-754.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argued November 5, 1975.

Decided May 19, 1976.

CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT.

Deputy Solicitor General Frey argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Bork, Acting Assistant Attorney General Keeney, and Shirley Baccus-Lobel.

Michael Allen Peters, by appointment of the Court, 421 U. S. 944, argued the cause pro hac vice and filed a brief for respondent.[*]

2Judgment of the CourtChief Justice Burger

This case presents the question whether the warnings called for by Miranda v.…

Also in this document: Concurring in the judgment · Brennan; Concurring in the judgment · Stewart.

3Cases cited125 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

120 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API