Legal Opinion

Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. Kurtz

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 1995No. 94-2651PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

We have reviewed the stipulations and agree that respondent committed the cited misconduct. However, we consider a stay of the six-month suspension period too lenient for respondent’s violations of DR 2-106(A), 9-102(A), and 9-102(B)(3) and (4). We, therefore, order that respondent be suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for a period of six months, with this *21suspension to be followed by a two-year monitored probation under the condition that he makes full restitution with interest at the judgment rate to the Tuballeses by the end of his probation. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Burns v. DailyOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. AlsfelderOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. KurtzOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Cleveland Bar Assn. v. KurtzOhio Supreme Court · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API