Legal Opinion

Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Kurtz

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 1995No. 1994-2651Published

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 72 Ohio St.3d 18.] CLEVELAND BAR ASSOCIATION V. KURTZ. [Cite as Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Kurtz,

1995-Ohio-103.] Attorneys at law—Misconduct—Six-month suspension followed by two-year monitored probation on condition that full restitution is made to clients— Charging an excessive fee—Failure to place client's funds in an identifiable bank account—Failure to appropriately account to client—Failure to promptly deliver client's property. (No. 94-2651—Submitted January 24, 1995—Decided April 12, 1995.) ON CERTIFIED REPORT by the Board of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. KurtzOhio Supreme Court · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API