Legal Opinion

Anderson v. SAVANNAH MACHINE & FOUNDRY COMPANY

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 16, 1957No. 36869PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTownsend, J.

1. The construction placed upon a Federal statute by a United States Court of Appeals, where certiorari has been denied by the United States Supreme Court, is, if not absolutely binding upon this court (see Bugg v. Consolidated Grocery Co., 155 Ga. 550, 552, 118 S. E. 56) at least entitled to high persuasive consideration (Morgan v. Limbaugh, 75 Ga. App. 663, 666, 44 S. E. 2d 394).

2. It is provided under the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act, 33 U.S.C.A. § 905, that the benefits awarded under that act “shall be exclusive and in place of all other liability of such employer…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Morgan v. LimbaughCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1947
  2. Bugg v. Consolidated Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1923

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Massey v. Thiokol Chemical CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1973
  2. Mardian Const. Co. v. Sup. Court, Maricopa Cty.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1988
  3. Lunsford v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
  4. Summers v. Deutsche Seereederei Rostok GmbhCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  5. Atlantic Container Services v. GodbeeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API