Mardian Const. Co. v. Sup. Court, Maricopa Cty.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JACOBSON, Presiding Judge.
The. sole issue in this special action is whether an employee’s spouse is barred from suing her husband’s employer for loss of consortium arising out of injuries occurring to the husband in the course and scope of his employment because of the “exclusive remedy” provision^ of A.R.S. §§ 23-1022 and 906(A).
This case arises out of an industrial injury sustained by Harold Henry on December 21,1982. Mr. Henry filed a claim for worker’s compensation benefits through his employer, Mardian Construction Company, which was accepted and compensation paid.
Mr. and Mrs.…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Whittlesey v. MillerTexas Supreme Court · 1978
- Smither and Company, Inc. v. Franciska T. ColesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
- Thibodeaux v. J. Ray McDermott & Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
- Ash v. S. S. Mullen, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1953
- Garrett v. Reno Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Archer v. Roadrunner Trucking, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
- Diaz v. Magma Copper Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
- Ledeaux v. Motorola Solutions, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2024
- Martinez v. ShcCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017