Legal Opinion
State v. Tanzola
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided March 19, 1964PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
83 N.J. Super. 40 (1964)
198 A.2d 811
THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
ANTHONY TANZOLA, NICHOLAS FERRONI, SALVATORE ZULLO, AND JACOB ROSENFELD, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued November 25, 1963.
Decided March 19, 1964.
Before Judges GAULKIN, FOLEY and LEWIS.
Mr. Donald R. Conway argued the cause for the defendants (Mr. Benedict E. Lucchi, attorney).
Mr. Robert Dilts, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for the plaintiff (Mr. Guy W. Calissi, Bergen County Prosecutor, attorney).
The opinion of the court was delivered by GAULKIN, S.J.A.D.
Th…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. ChristyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970
- Rutledge v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971
- State v. MurphyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
- State v. KasabuckiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
- State v. FerraraNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.