Legal Opinion

Oxford v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 7, 1906No. 3531PublishedCited by 4 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

HEKDEBSOF, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of violating the local option law, his punishment fixed at a fine of $25 and twenty days confinement in the county jail; hence this appeal. The case was tried by the court without the intervention of a jury, and the sole question is the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict. The evidence shows that Jim Oxford was the agent of Bennett, a liquor dealer of Fort Worth; that he lived in Erath County, a local option county, and ordered whisky for parties from Bennett at Fort Worth, on which he got a commission of 15 per cent., where the parties…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Koll v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1941
  2. Garrett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1950
  3. Kennard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
  4. Whitstone v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API