Legal Opinion

Whitstone v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided December 20, 1911No. 1468PublishedCited by 2 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

This is a local option case. The sale is alleged to have been made to Ned Pye.

The facts show, for the State, through the witness, Burns, that on the 3d of December, 1910, he was in the little town of Sacul. Ned Pye told the witness he wanted a, quart of whisky; witness told him he thought he could get it for him, and further told him that appellant had some whisky; Pye gave the witness a dollar in silver consisting of two half dollar pieces. He saw appellant down near the depot with a package of eight quarts of whisky that he had just gotten out of the express…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bruce v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1898
  2. Miles v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
  3. Oxford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1906
  4. Smart v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1906
  5. Whittlesey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. Benjamin Raysor, and Hugh Gene Mosley, Benjamin Raysor, in No. 13486, Hugh Gene Mosley, in No. 13487Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1961
  2. United States v. Benjamin Raysor, and Hugh Gene Mosley, Benjamin Raysor, in No. 13486, Hugh Gene Mosley, in No. 13487Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API