Moore v. . Hill
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Civil ActioN tried at January Special Term, 1881, of SampsoN Superior Court, before McKoy, J. Judgment for plaintiff, appeal by defendants.
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, C. J.
The action is upon a promissory note under seal executed by the defendants to Thomas B. Ashford, and the recovery is resisted upon the allegation of a failure of consideration and an assignment to the plaintiff after its maturity. After the jury were empanelled, no issues hav- iug been previously prepared,- the court drew up and submitted those set out in the record, in response to which the-findings are in- substance, that the'steam enginefor the payment of which the note was given was not the property of Ashford, but belonged to-the plaintiff, arid there was no-fraud in the sale that the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Brumble v. . BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1874
- Curtis v. . CashSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
- Sapona Iron Company v. . HoltSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1870
3Cited by11 opinions
- Walker v. . ScottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
- Karns v. OlneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Norwood v. Lassiter.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
- Willey v. Norfolk Southern RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
- McCall v. . GallowaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.