Coté v. Bachelder-Worcester Co.
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtBranch, J.
I. The argument of the plaintiff with reference to the first question reserved by the trial court may be summarized as follows: “The widow is not suing for a wrong done to or on a right ac- • quired by the employee, but for a loss to her, and on a right of her own.” “It is a statutory right created by the statute for her benefit expressly made determinable at the time of the death of the employee, and not arising until then. ... It follows that the law existing at the time of death should govern the extent of the recovery.”
The provisions of the statute do not sustain this position. No right…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State ex rel. Carlson v. District Court of Hennepin CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Beaver Dam Coal Co. v. HockerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
- Virden v. SmithNevada Supreme Court · 1922
- Quilty v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
- State Ex Rel. Western Stevedore Co. v. JonesWashington Supreme Court · 1927
3Cited by20 opinions
- Lancaster v. State Compensation CommissionerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1942
- McAllister v. Bd. of Ed., KearnyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963
- Burnham v. DowningSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
- Carroll v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.