Moorman v. Moorman
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtO’Malley, J.
The appellant commenced an action in the Ripley Circuit Court to secure the appointment of a receiver of the partnership in which her deceased husband was the owner of a one-third interest.
It was asserted in the complaint that the appointment of a receiver to take over and settle partnership affairs was mandatory because the surviving partners had failed to comply with the statute relating to the duties of a surviving partner. § 50-301 et seq., Burns’ 1933. The appellees countered with a claim that the partners had entered into an agreement which provided a method of settlement of the…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Malden Trust Co. v. BrooksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Valentine v. WysorIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Malden Trust Co. v. BrooksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
- State v. MatthewsIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
- Feucht v. Corbett, Admr.Indiana Supreme Court · 1938
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Thomas Ex Rel. Schmidt v. ThomasNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- Spencer v. SpencerIdaho Supreme Court · 1967
- Graham v. StrattonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1964
- Graham v. StrattonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1964
- Pearson v. HahnIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976