Legal Opinion
Meiselman v. Allstate Insurance
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 12, 1993PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In an action to recover damages for breach of a homeowner’s insurance policy, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Copertino, J.), dated July 5, 1991, as denied her postjudgment interest for the period following her rejection of the defendant’s tender of the judgment amount.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The Supreme Court properly concluded that the defendant’s unconditional tender of the judgment amount stopped the running of postjudgment interest pursuant to CPLR 5003…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Juracka v. FerraraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Pollock v. CollippAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Pellegrino v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1986
- Pellegrino v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Martin v. TafflockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
3Cited by12 opinions
- Cohen v. Transcontinental InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Matra Building Corp. v. KuckerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- O'Rourk v. BernerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- BIRMINGHAM PAIN CENTER, INC. v. CosgroveCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2004
- Gamman v. SilvermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.