Legal Opinion

Clients' Security Fund v. Grandeau

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 9, 1986PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*674OPINION OF THE COURT

Harold J. Hughes, J.

The issue before the court is whether the Clients’ Security Fund of the State of New York (Fund) can recover in a subrogation suit for payments made by the Fund to clients of a partnership against the partner of a dishonest attorney.

The Fund was created by Laws of 1981 (ch 714) and its purpose "is to promote public confidence in the administration of justice and the integrity of the legal profession by reimbursing losses caused by the dishonest conduct of attorneys admitted and licensed to practice law in the courts of New York State” (22 NYCRR 7200.1).…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re DahowskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Clients' Security Fund v. GrandeauNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. Clients' Security Fund v. GrandeauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  3. Schettino v. AlterNew York Supreme Court · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API