Danow v. Law Office of David E. Borack, P.A.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Non-Argument Calendar.
1Per curiam
The Law Office of David E. Borack, P.A. (the “Law Office”) appeals from a final judgment awarding Harry L. Danow attorneys’ fees and costs pursuant to the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”), 15 U.S.C. §§ 1692-1692p, following the jury verdict and final judgment entered in favor of Danow on his claim that the Law Office violated the FDCPA. The Law Office previously appealed the final judgment entered on the merits of Danow’s FDCPA claim, and this Court affirmed. In this appeal, the Law Office argues that the district court erred in granting attorneys’ fees and costs to Danow despite…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. AugustSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Reiter v. MTA New York City Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Pat Jordan v. Time, Incorporated, Pat Jordan v. Time, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
- King v. RivasCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
3Cited by1 opinion
- Davis v. Mar-Jac Poultry AL, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2024