Legal Opinion

Hefner v. Robert

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 22, 1906No. 14,229PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to the district court for Otoe county: Paul Jes-sen, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Oldham, C.

This is an action to recover on a written contract for tbe purchase of a horse, entered into between plaintiff and defendant, as follows: “Omaha, Neb., March 24, 1902. This contract entered into by and between Ed Robert, of Guthrie Center, Iowa, and O. O. Hefner, of Omaha, wit-nesseth as follows: That O. O. Hefner has this day sold the imported shire horse named ‘Girton Royal Tom,’ for the sum of $1,300, upon the following terms and divisions, payable, $800 in one coach horse, $100 cash in hand, and $400 due in one year, with six per cent, interest from date. This contract notes…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Curtiss v. GreenbanksSupreme Court of Vermont · 1852

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mizell v. WatsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1909
  2. Robert v. HefnerNebraska Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Aegerter v. RonspiesNebraska Supreme Court · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API