Legal Opinion
Mizell v. Watson
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided January 15, 1909PublishedCited by 17 opinions
This case was decided by Division B. Writ of Error to the Circuit Court for Jackson County. The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtParkhill, J.
The defendtants in error sued the plaintiffs in error in the Circuit Court for Jackson County, as set forth in the declaration as follows:
“Now come the plaintiffs aixd sue the defendants and for cause of action say: That whereas the said defendants bargained and sold to the plaintiffs a certain horse for $180.00, which said horse, the said defendants, by their agents who sold said horse, represented said horse to be sound and all right, when in truth and in fact said horse was not sound and not alright, but was so physically afflicted in his legs and feet that he was without value and useless…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Grimes v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Bacon v. GreenSupreme Court of Florida · 1895
- Doane v. DunhamIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
- Little v. BradleySupreme Court of Florida · 1901
- Churchill v. PriceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1878
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Peacock Hotel, Inc. v. ShipmanSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
- United States Rubber Products, Inc. v. ClarkSupreme Court of Florida · 1941
- Hirschman v. Hodges, O'Hara & Russell Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1910
- Dade County v. City of North Miami BeachSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
- Farnham v. BlountSupreme Court of Florida · 1942
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.