Legal Opinion
McCall v. Brooks
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided June 6, 1977No. Civ. A. No. 75-3659PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
EDWARD R. BECKER, District Judge.
I. Preliminary Statement
This action is brought under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq.1 ■ The plaintiffs are *641Coleman McCall and Daniel Seymore, employees of the United States Treasury Department at the United States Mint in Philadelphia. The defendants are Mary T. Brooks, Mint Director, Nicholas G. Theodore, Mint Superintendent, and the Secretary of the Treasury. The plaintiffs each allege racial discrimination in the denial of an appointment to the position of foreman, based on purposefully…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Brown v. General Services AdministrationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Chandler v. RoudebushSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Aeronautical Communications Equipment, Inc. v. PierceSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Sandra K. Rucker, Herbert Rucker, Cheryl Dunham, Etc., and James Dunham v. Wabash Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969
- Copeland v. BrennanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1975
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bethel v. JeffersonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
- Funderburk v. LehmanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
- James A. Bethel, Jr. v. Burtell M. Jefferson, Chief of Police, Metropolitan Police Department. Ernest E. Hemby v. Burtell M. Jefferson, Chief of Police, Metropolitan Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
- McCall v. BrooksCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980