Legal Opinion

In re Fischer

California Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 1892No. 13785PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Alameda County. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Belcher, C.

On the sixteenth day of April, 1889, F. L. Fischer executed and delivered to Hermann Meese his promissory note for four thousand four hundred dollars, bearing interest at the rate of ten per cent per annum; and to secure the payment of the note, he at the same time executed and delivered to Meese a chattel mortgage upon “ all the printing-presses and material situated at Nos. 310 and 312 Battery Street, in the city and county of San Francisco, state of California, belonging to said mortgagor, and more particularly described as follows, to wit.” Then followed a long list or schedule…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Old Settlers Investment Co. v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  2. San Francisco Breweries v. SchurtzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Bank of Ukiah v. GibsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API