Legal Opinion

Rose Marie Reyes v. Michael Maschmeier

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided April 20, 2006No. 05-12720PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BIRCH, Circuit Judge:

In this case, we review a nuanced application of the Fourth Amendment in the public employment realm. Rose Marie Reyes brought a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that she was unconstitutionally seized when she was struck by Michael Maschmeier, her supervisor and a sergeant in the county sheriffs office, and subsequently berated in an open door meeting. The district court denied the claim, reasoning that the force used was not unreasonable, but we, however, conclude that there was never a seizure within the constitutional meaning of that word and AFFIRM on that ground.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. DelgadoSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Garrity v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Brower Ex Rel. Estate of Caldwell v. County of InyoSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Michigan v. ChesternutSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Southern Grouts & Mortars, Inc. v. 3M Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
  2. Feirson v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
  3. Michael Chapman v. Jefferson DunnCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2025
  4. Volpe v. New York City Department of EducationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
  5. Moon v. BrownDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 2013

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API