Legal Opinion

Federal Reserve Bank v. Panama City

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided January 27, 1937No. 8165PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIBLEY, Circuit Judge.

The District Judge rejected as evidence the note sued on, thus compelling the plaintiff Federal Reserve Bank to take a nonsuit. This is the only error assigned. The declaration was in two counts, one on the note given by city of Panama City for value received to the order of First National Bank of Panama City and indorsed by payee, in which count $7,250 principal and interest and attorney’s fees were claimed as promised; and the other count was for money had and received by the city for the use of the First National Bank, the right to recover which had been assigned to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Claiborne County v. BrooksSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Wall v. County of MonroeSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  3. Pacific Imp. Co. v. City of ClarksdaleCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1896
  4. Watson v. City of HuronCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1899
  5. County of Ouachita v. WolcottSupreme Court of the United States · 1881

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Port of Palm Beach Dist. v. GoethalsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1939
  2. Panama City v. Federal Reserve BankCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API