Panama City v. Federal Reserve Bank

HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.

The former appeal of this cause1 established as the law of the case that the note sued on should have been admitted in evidence as a valid obligation of the City. This appeal from a judgment on the note seeks to raise again the question of its validity, and, in addition, challenges the judgment as erroneous: (a) for want of proof of appellee’s ownership of the note; and (b) because appellant’s plea of offset was rejected.

We think the first point is foreclosed by the .former opinion, that the additional points are not well taken, and that the judgment should stand. The…