Legal Opinion

Harris v. Home Indemnity Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 1959PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJoseph A. Gavagakt, J.

The individual defendants move under rule 112 of the Rules of Civil Practice for judgment on the pleadings to dismiss the second cause of action of the complaint and the plaintiff cross-moves under rule 109 to dismiss the affirmative defenses for unsufficiency. The plaintiff is a former employee of the corporate defendant and the individual defendants are officers of the corporation. The challenged cause of action addressed to the individual defendants alleges, among ‘other things, that their wrongful acts resulted in the termination of plaintiff’s employment. On a prior motion the first…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Martin v. New York Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  2. Rice v. . ManleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  3. Beardsley v. . KilmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  4. Dung v. . ParkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  5. Watson v. . GuginoNew York Court of Appeals · 1912

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mack v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1986
  2. Lauter v. W & J SLOANE, INC.District Court, S.D. New York · 1976
  3. Cohen v. Brunswick Record Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1961
  4. MacK v. US, FBIDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1986
  5. Ohnemus v. PreusseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API