Legal Opinion
United States v. Pete
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided April 20, 1953No. Cr. 199-53Published
1Opinion of the Court
111 F.Supp. 292 (1953)
UNITED STATES
v.
PETE.
Cr. No. 199-53.
United States District Court District of Columbia, Criminal Division.
March 23, 1953.
On Rehearing April 20, 1953.
Charles M. Irelan, U. S. Atty., and Martin J. McNamara, Asst. U. S. Atty., Washington, D. C., for plaintiff.
Foster Wood, Washington, D. C., for defendant.
LAWS, Chief Judge.
Defendant has filed a motion to suppress evidence which she had admittedly embezzled and turned over to another for safe-keeping. The property was seized in the unlawful arrest of the party to whom defendant had given the property. No search of premises was…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. JeffersSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Shores v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1949
- Jeffers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
- Washington v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1953
- United States v. PeteDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1953
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.