Legal Opinion

Wright v. Wright

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 4, 1927PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBraley, J.

This is a petition for separate support and maintenance brought under G. L. c. 209, § 32. The judge found and ruled that the petition could not be maintained, and after entering a decree dismissing it, under G. L. c. 215, § 13, reserved and reported the questions of law raised by his findings and rulings for our determination. “If the petitioner is entitled to maintain her petition, I find, on the evidence, that she is living apart from the respondent for justifiable cause and that an order should be entered” requiring the respondent to pay her monthly a certain sum for her support until the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Griffin v. GriffinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
  2. Crawford v. RolosonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
  3. Littlejohn v. LittlejohnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
  4. West v. JohnsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wright v. WrightMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
  2. Wiakowicz v. HwalekMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
  3. Lebow v. SneiersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
  4. Wintemberg v. Turners Falls Power & Electric Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API