Legal Opinion
Wiakowicz v. Hwalek
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided November 24, 1930PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.
These exceptions relate to the allowance of the plaintiff’s motion to dismiss a bill of exceptions filed and allowed -touching the trial of the case on its merits. The ground of the motion to dismiss was that the defendant had neglected to take the necessary measures for prosecuting the exceptions. The case at bar is governed by G. L. c. 231, § 135, whereby it is required that exceptions be entered in the full court “as soon as may be after” their allowance. St. 1929, c. 265, §§ 1 and 8, had not become operative at the time of the events here under review.* The motion was heard on the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Chicago, St. Louis & New Orleans Railroad v. Pullman Southern Car Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Griffin v. GriffinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
- Wheaton Building & Lumber Co. v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
- Henderson v. Travelers InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
- Crawford v. RolosonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Commonwealth v. McKnightMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Dondis v. LashMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
- McCarty v. BoydenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
- Home Owners' Loan Corp. v. SweeneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
- St. Nicholas Russian Benefit Society, Inc. v. YaselkoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.