Legal Opinion

Galeas v. City of Atlanta

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 12, 1953No. 34477PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWorrill, J.

1. The failure of the plaintiff in error to designate in the bill of exceptions the names of the defendants in error being an amendable defect, and an omission of information that can be ascertained from the record in this case, and the plaintiff in error having made a motion in this court to amend the bill of exceptions by incorporating therein the names of the defendants in error, the motion of the defendants in error to dismiss the writ of error is denied. Code § 6-1309; Carter v. Parrish, 154 Ga. 531 (1b) (114 S. E. 709); Thornton v. Southern Ry. Co., 71 Ga. App. 530 (1) (31 S. E. 2d 189).

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Carter v. ParrishSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  2. Hendricks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1944
  3. Mathis v. City of NashvilleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  4. Mathis v. City of NashvilleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  5. Thornton v. Southern Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1944

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Washburn Storage Co. v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
  2. Harvey v. LissnerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API