Legal Opinion

Territory v. Ho Me

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 1922No. 1359PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Reseevbd Questions from Circuit Court First Circuit. Hon. J. J. Banks, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

KEMP, J.

The defendant Ho Me was charged with the offense of unlawfully having in his possession certain opium or a preparation thereof contrary to the provisions of section *3322075 R. L. 1915 as amended by Act 143 S. L. 1915. The offense was alleged to have been committed on or about March 22, 1921. Before a jury was selected or sworn the defendant interposed his verified motion for the return of certain personal property which was being held by the city and county attorney, which motion contains in substance the following allegations: That on March 21,1921, he was in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Gouled v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. Amos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. Youngblood v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1920
  4. Kapiolani Estate, Ltd. v. AtcherleyHawaii Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Rubenstein v. H. Hackfeld & Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1906

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. PokiniHawaii Supreme Court · 1961
  2. State v. PattioayHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. Yong Shik WonHawaii Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Territory of Hawaii v. WarrenHawaii Supreme Court · 1939
  5. State v. PattioayHawaii Supreme Court · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API