Legal Opinion

State v. Cioffe

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided May 2, 1942PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Brogan, Chief Justice.

The plaintiffs in error, Alfred F. Duggan and Nicholas A. Cioffe, were convicted of robbery in the Monmouth County Quarter Sessions and jail sentence was imposed upon each. The indictment charged that the defendants held up and robbed two bank messengers, Joseph Sturm and J. Clarence Barton, of a sum of money ($108,000) at the City of Asbury Park, New Jersey, on the morning of July 30th, 1940.

The assignments of error and specification of causes for reversal (eighty-three in number) are argued under nineteen headings. The case was submitted on brief. The points made will…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Hebert v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. State v. MorehousSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1922
  3. State v. HendrickSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1903
  4. State v. MohrSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1923
  5. State v. LangSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1907

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. BuhlNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994
  2. State v. GoodmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
  3. Hester v. GoldsburyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1965
  4. State v. WilliamsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
  5. State v. TraversNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API