Legal Opinion

Rutkoski v. Hollis

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 30, 1992No. 4-91-0798PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Knecht

Plaintiff, Mary Rutkoski, filed a one-count amended legal malpractice complaint in the Sangamon County circuit court against defendant, attorney Richard Hollis, on behalf of her deceased husband’s estate. She appeals from the trial court’s dismissal of her complaint. The complaint alleged her husband, Charles Rutkoski, received deficient advice regarding his role as executor of the estate of his orother, Alexander Rutkoski. The trial court concluded the complaint failed to state a cause of action because Illinois law precludes recovery for economic losses in legal malpractice cases where the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. McGrath v. FaheyIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Pelham v. GriesheimerIllinois Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Ogle v. FuitenIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Collins v. ReynardIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  5. McLane v. RussellIllinois Supreme Court · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Jewish Hospital of St. Louis, Missouri v. Boatmen's National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  2. Jewish Hosp. v. BOARTMEN'S NAT. BANKAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  3. Leyba v. WhitleyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Loman v. FreemanAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006
  5. Hopkins v. AkinsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API