Legal Opinion

Warder v. Shalala

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided July 27, 1998No. 97-2047PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMPBELL, Senior Circuit Judge.

This appeal relates to the classification, for Medicare Part B reimbursement purposes, of medical equipment made for persons suffering from severe musculoskeletal problems. Produced by Appellees OrthoConeepts and used by Appellee Warder, the equipment consists of braces, fitted to the individual patient, on a wheeled base. The district court upheld OrthoConeepts’ challenge to an administrative ruling (“the Ruling” or “HCFAR 96-1”) from the Health Care Financing Administration (“HCFA”) that classifies this equipment as “durable medical equipment” rather than as…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Chrysler Corp. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Alessi v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Iowa League of Cities v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
  2. Allina Health Services v. Kathleen SebeliusCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
  3. St. Francis Health Care Centre v. Donna ShalalaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
  4. Monmouth Medical Center v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
  5. Gary Lee Gunderson v. Robert A. Hood, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API