Glinton v. AND R, INC.
Supreme Court of Georgia
1DissentBenham, Chief Justice
I respectfully disagree with the majority’s conclusion that OCGA § 7-4-18, the criminal usury statute, and OCGA § 44-12-130 et seq., the pawnbroker statute, are in irreconcilable conflict such that the former cannot apply to pawn transactions. On the contrary, I believe the statutes can and must be read in harmony with one another. “When the courts are called upon to determine if there is a conflict between statutes they are required to undertake to construe them together and seek to give full effect to both laws as representing all of the legislative intention. [Cit.]” Fulton County v. Corp.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ford Motor Co. v. AbercrombieSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
- Alford v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Georgia · 1992
- Buice v. DixonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1967
- Norris v. Sigler Daisy CorporationSupreme Court of Georgia · 1990
- Fulton County v. Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day SaintsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.