Legal Opinion

State v. Saunders

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided September 3, 1993No. 20178PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PERRY, Judge.

Four days prior to his scheduled trial on a charge of lewd conduct with a minor under the age of sixteen, Charles William Saunders filed a motion for a continuance based on newly discovered evidence. At the hearing, one day prior to trial, the motion was denied. The following morning, before the commencement of the trial, Saunders filed a motion to disqualify the district judge pursuant to I.C.R. 25(b)(4), alleging that the district judge was biased and prejudiced against him. The motion was denied.

A jury trial was held and Saunders was convicted, receiving a unified sentence of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. ToohillIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. State v. ReinkeIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. State v. NiceIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  4. State v. SanchezIdaho Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. State v. WolfeIdaho Supreme Court · 1978

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. HawkinsIdaho Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. State v. WoodIdaho Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State v. GriffithIdaho Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. State v. ElliottIdaho Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. State v. Justin Lee WilsonIdaho Court of Appeals · 2015

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API