The State of California, Acting by and Through the Department of Water Resources v. The Oroville-Wyandotte Irrigation District, an Irrigation District
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Before HUFSTEDLER and CHOY, Circuit Judges, and PREGERSON, * District Judge. PER CURIAM:
This is an appeal in a controversy between two agencies of the State of California, the Department of Water Resources and The Or oville-Wyandotte Irrigation District. The principal issue is whether Decision 82561 of the California Public Utilities Commission issued March 12, 1974 in Application No. 48869 conflicts with the order of the Federal Power Commission issued January 17, 1974 affecting Projects 2088 and 2100.
In a well-written and comprehensive memorandum decision issued on August 8, 1975,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- California v. Oroville-Wyandotte Irrigation DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1975
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. Southern California Edison Co.District Court, E.D. California · 2004
- City of Gainesville v. Florida Power & Light Co.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1980
- New Orleans Public Service, Inc. v. The City of New Orleans, the Council for the City of New Orleans, Sidney J. BarthelemyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- City of Cleveland v. The Cleveland Electric Illuminating CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
- Narragansett Electric Co. v. Constellation Energy Commodities Group, Inc.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 2007
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.