Legal Opinion
California v. Oroville-Wyandotte Irrigation District
District Court, E.D. California
Decided August 8, 1975No. Civ. S-74-597PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
MacBRIDE, Chief Judge.
HISTORY OF THE CASE
Plaintiff State of California, acting through the Department of Water Resources [hereafter DWR] initiated this declaratory and injunctive relief action against defendant Oroville-Wyandotte Irrigation District [hereafter OWID], Both DWR and OWID are agencies of the State of California. California Water Code § 120 and § 11102. Both DWR and OWID are also licensees of the federal government through the Federal Power Commission [hereafter FPC]: DWR is licensed by the FPC pursuant to the Federal Power Act to construct and operate Project 2100 (a…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- First Iowa Hydro-Electric Cooperative v. Federal Power CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- State of California v. Oroville-Wyandotte Irrigation DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States v. Southern California Edison Co.District Court, E.D. California · 2004
- City of Gainesville v. Florida Power & Light Co.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1980
- New Orleans Public Service, Inc. v. The City of New Orleans, the Council for the City of New Orleans, Sidney J. BarthelemyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- City of Cleveland v. The Cleveland Electric Illuminating CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
- The State of California, Acting by and Through the Department of Water Resources v. The Oroville-Wyandotte Irrigation District, an Irrigation DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.