In the matter of the paper-writings purporting to be the last will & testament & codicil thereto of Chadwick
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On appeal from a decree of the prerogative court advised b3r Vice-Chancellor Walker, whose opinion is reported ante ¶. IBS.
1Opinion of the Court
The -opinion of the court was delivered hv
Bergen, J.
The substantial question on this appeal is whether the surrogates of our several counties, or the prerogative court, have jurisdiction to grant original probate of a will of a non-resident testator domiciled in a sister state at the time of his death.
While the precise question raised by the record relates to the power of a surrogate to admit srjch will to probate, the jurisdiction of the prerogative court in a like case is so connected with the principles of law involved, that it was of necessity argued and should be disposed of in…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Naab v. SmithWyoming Supreme Court · 1940
- Bowles v. R. G. Dun-Bradstreet Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1940
- In Re FischerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1935
- In Re Probate of FisherNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
- In Re SimpsonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1945
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.