Legal Opinion

Jacaway v. State

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided July 8, 1976No. 12013PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an action brought under the Idaho Tort Claims Act, I.C. §§ 6-901 et seq. It is uncontested that the plaintiffs did not comply with the requirement of I.C. § 6-905 by presenting their claim against the state within 120 days after their alleged cause of action arose. The district court dismissed the action under the authority of I.C. § 6-908, which provides that no action shall be allowed against the state unless a claim has been presented within the time limits prescribed by the Idaho Tort Claims Act and our decisions construing that statute.

We affirm on the authority of Newlan v.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. DeSa v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Newlan v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Independent School Dist. of Boise City v. CallisterIdaho Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Curl v. Indian Springs Natatorium, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1976

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Overman v. KleinIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Tovar v. BillmeyerIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Udell v. Idaho State Board of Land Commissioners ex rel. Idaho Attorney GeneralIdaho Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Overman v. KleinIdaho Supreme Court · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API