Legal Opinion

The Einar Beyer

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided October 26, 1925No. 9488Published

1Opinion of the Court

NETERER, District Judge.

Under admiralty rule 7 the premiums, on stipulation of the parties to the suit, shall be taxed as costs. Attached to the cost bill are vouchers for the premiums paid by claimant to the surety company. This disposes of those items. Parkerson v. Borst, 256 F. 827, 168 C. C. A. 173; The Texas, 226 F. 897, 141 C. C. A. 501.

Proctor’s fees, under United States laws, are provided by sections 823, 824, R. S. (sections 1375 and 1378, Comp. St.). For proctor’s fees: “On final hearing in equity or admiralty, a docket fee of $20.00.”

Adjudications as to what constitutes a final…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Vannevar v. BryantSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Wooster v. HandyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1885
  3. Parkerson v. BorstCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1919
  4. The TexasCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1915
  5. Black Diamond Coal-Min. Co. v. The H. C. GradyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1898

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API