Legal Opinion

Arenstein v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided August 2, 1993No. Docket Nos. 15828-90, 15829-90, 15830-90, 16019-90Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

MARVIN O. ARENSTEIN, D.O., Ph.D., P.A., ET AL., 1 Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Arenstein v. Commissioner

Docket Nos. 15828-90, 15829-90, 15830-90, 16019-90

United States Tax Court

T.C. Memo 1993-339; 1993 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 341; 66 T.C.M. (CCH) 282;

August 2, 1993, Filed

Decision will be entered for respondent except with respect to the additions to tax for fraud against Roberta Arenstein.

For petitioner in docket Nos. 15828-90, 15829-90, and 15830-90: Jerome S. Richman, Edward P. Guttenmacher, John Steven Bohatch, and Mitchell Stuart Fuerst.

For petitioner in docket…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Commissioner v. South Texas Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. United States v. CorrellSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Bingler v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Dixie Pine Products Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1944

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API