Legal Opinion

Spawr v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 4, 1986No. 85-6483PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TANG, Circuit Judge:

The Spawrs appeal from the dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction of their damages claim under the Federal Torts Claim Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346, 2671-2680 (1982). The Spawrs filed their claim in district court seeking damages for suspension of their export privileges by the Department of Commerce. The court dismissed the claim because the Spawrs had not first filed an administrative claim with the Department as required by the F.T.C.A. We affirm.

This court reviews a dismissal for lack of jurisdiction de novo because the construction of a statute granting…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wallace G. Frederick v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  2. Societe De Conditionnement en Aluminium v. Hunter Engineering Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  3. Robert F. Burns v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  4. Davis v. BolgerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1980
  5. United States v. TaylorDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1972

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Mildred Jerves v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  2. United States v. Iron Mountain Mines, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 1995
  3. United States v. Iron Mountain Mines, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 1993
  4. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. CarterDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1987
  5. Federal Deposit Insurance v. F.S.S.S.District Court, D. Alaska · 1993

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API