Legal Opinion
Consentino v. Schwartz
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 27, 1989PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
— In an action to recover on a promissory note, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Goldstein, J.), entered December 12, 1988, which denied his motion to strike the defendant’s interrogatories.
Ordered that the order is modified by deleting therefrom the provision denying that branch of the plaintiff’s motion which was to strike interrogatory number six, and substituting therefor a provision granting that branch of the plaintiff’s motion; as so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements, and the plaintiff is directed to serve answers to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Engel v. LightermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Matthews Industrial Piping Co. v. Mobil Oil Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Mayo, Lynch & Associates, Inc. v. FineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Corradetti v. Dales Used CarsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
3Cited by15 opinions
- Zimmer v. Cathedral School of St. Mary & St. PaulAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Grossman v. LacoffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Dore v. Allstate Indemnity Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Kay v. KayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Supama Coal Sales Co. v. JacksonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.