Legal Opinion
Corradetti v. Dales Used Cars
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 21, 1984PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Casey, J.
Since the three-day extension provided for in CPLR 2103 (subd [b], par 2) was applicable herein, plaintiff’s bill of particulars was timely served on March 25,1981 in compliance with the terms of a 20-day conditional order of preclusion served upon plaintiff by mail on March 2, 1981. Accordingly, Special Term’s order denying defendant’s motion for a final order of preclusion must be affirmed.
CPLR 2103 (subd [b], par 2) authorizes the service of papers upon a party in a pending action by mailing them to the party’s attorney, and further provides that “where a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bostwick v. BrinkerhoffSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Brinckerhoff v. . BostwickNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- Board of Education of Union Free School District No. 6 v. Town of GreenburghNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
- Jemzura v. BenanatiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- Frans Pets, Inc. v. Aggen, New York County Courts1981
3Cited by9 opinions
- Consentino v. SchwartzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Sultana v. Nassau HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Penn v. American Airlines, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Mackay v. BradleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Zachary D. OliverAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.