Legal Opinion

People v. Marshall

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 28, 1976No. Docket 25020PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.

"To none will we sell, to none will we deny or delay, right or justice.”

—Magna Carta (1215)

This interlocutory appeal raises the question of the constitutional validity of nonstatutory procedures under which the defendant was taken into custody, allegedly without probable cause to arrest, under an order issued by a judicial officer granting the temporary detention of defendant for the purpose of obtaining a blood type sample and a hair sample.

On August 19, 1974, the bodies of Wallace Marshall, his wife Constance, and one Beatrice Williams were discovered at the Marshall residence on LaSalle…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In re of an Investigation into the Death of Jon L.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. State v. HallSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
  3. People v. LovettMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. People v. CordsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. People v. PerlosMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API