Boeing Co. v. U.S.A.C. Transport, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
KOELSCH, Circuit Judge:
The Boeing Company (“Boeing”) brought this action against the defendant motor carrier (“USAC”)1 to recover stipulated actual damages of $437,058.82 sustained when two of its jet engines were damaged during transit on one of USAC’s trucks. Based on the conclusion that Boeing had contractually agreed to limit carrier’s liability by shipping the engines on a “released value” basis,2 the district court granted USAC’s motion for summary judgment and entered judgment in favor of Boeing in the lesser sum of $62,757.50. Boeing appeals, and we affirm.
Here the standard of Federal…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- American Railway Express Co. v. LindenburgSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. LeatherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Glickfeld v. Howard Van Lines, Inc. Howard Van Lines, Inc. v. GlickfeldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
- Shelton Yacht & Cabana Club, Inc. v. SutoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Hughes Aircraft Company National Union Fire Insurance Company v. North American Van Lines, Inc., and Does 1-100, InclusiveCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- William A. Cordingley v. Allied Van Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Acro Automation Systems, Inc. v. Iscont Shipping Ltd.District Court, D. Maryland · 1989
- Carmana Designs Ltd. v. North American Van Lines Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. v. Official Creditors Committee of CFLC, Inc. (In Re CFLC, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.