Legal Opinion

Kansas City ex rel. North Park District v. Scarritt

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 19, 1895PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Appeal from Jackson Circuit Court. — Hon. J. H. Slover, Judge. The court erred in overruling appellant’s objection to the introduction of any testimony in this case, because the act of the legislature under and by virtue of which the proceeding is had is unconstitutional and void. First. Because the purposes of said act are not clearly defined in its title, and the act contains more than one object. Const, of Mo., art. 4, sec. 28. Second.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Jackson Circuit Court. — Hon. J. H. Slover, Judge. The court erred in overruling appellant’s objection to the introduction of any testimony in this case, because the act of the legislature under and by virtue of which the proceeding is had is unconstitutional and void. First. Because the purposes of said act are not clearly defined in its title, and the act contains more than one object. Const, of Mo., art. 4, sec. 28. Second. The act is at war with the following provision of article 9, section 17, of the constitution, by which the legislative powers of cities of the class to…

1Opinion of the CourtBabclat, J.

This is a proceeding, begun June 7, 1894, to ■ subject to public use for a park a tract of some sixty acres of land in Kansas City, Missouri,

*647The plaintiff is “Kansas City at the relation and to the use of the North Park District.”

The defendants are Mr. Nathan Searritt and a number of other parties.owning parts of, or interests in, the land sought to be taken for the park.. The trial court found for the plaintiff, and entered judgment of condemnation, from which certain of the defendants appealed after the usual preliminaries.

The proceeding is grounded upon the provisions of an act, approved…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Kansas City v. FieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1889
  2. Kenefick v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
  3. Murnane v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Kansas City v. Marsh Oil Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1897
  2. Lackey v. State Ex Rel. GrantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  3. People ex rel. Johnson v. EarlSupreme Court of Colorado · 1908
  4. State v. KempSupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
  5. St. Louis v. DorrSupreme Court of Missouri · 1898

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API