Legal Opinion
Muench v. MEDFORD LAKES CO.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided June 7, 1968PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
101 N.J. Super. 263 (1968)
244 A.2d 141
WILMA E. MUENCH AND PAUL MUENCH, HER HUSBAND, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
MEDFORD LAKES COMPANY, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued December 18, 1967.
Decided June 7, 1968.
Before Judges CONFORD, COLLESTER and LABRECQUE.
Mr. James M. Davis, Jr. argued the cause for plaintiffs-appellants (Messrs. Powell & Davis, attorneys).
Mr. Michael A. Orlando argued the cause for defendant-respondent County of Burlington (Messrs. Orlando & Cummins, attorneys).
The opinion of the court was delivered by LABRECQUE, J.A.D.
Plaintiff Wilma E.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- B. W. King, Inc. v. Town of West New YorkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1967
- Board of Commissioners v. BaileyIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Monaco v. Comfort Bus Line, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1946
- Cleveland v. Town of WashingtonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1907
- Board of Chosen v. StraderSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1840
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Village of Chestnut Ridge v. HowardNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
- Kozikowski v. Delaware River Port AuthorityDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1975