Legal Opinion

Aluminum International Corp. v. Peterson Electric Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 29, 1983No. 82-130PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FAULKNER, Justice.

This is a petition for writ of mandamus to issue to Circuit Judge John D. Snodgrass. We grant the writ.

On August 27, 1982, this court rendered its decision in Utility Service Corporation of Huntsville, d/b/a Peterson Electric Co. v. Aluminum International Corp., 418 So.2d 870, (Ala.1982), reversing and remanding the cause to the trial judge to award an appropriate sum of damages to Peterson. We stated in an opinion authored by Justice Almon:

“Peterson’s sole contention is that the court erred in failing to award damages. We have reviewed the record and conclude there is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Jim Walter CorporationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
  2. Cox v. CoxCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1973
  3. Utility Service Corp. v. Aluminum International Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1982

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Ins. Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  2. Ex Parte BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  3. Alabama v. WoodardCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2003
  4. Banks v. BryantSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API