Legal Opinion

Flurry v. Hillcrest State Bank of University Park

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 5, 1966No. 7709PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIS, Justice.

Plaintiff-appellee, Hillcrest State Bank of University Park, sued defendant-appellant, H. L. Flurry, on the last of a series of five notes, alleging a balance still due of $6,-318.00, plus 10% interest and attorney fees. According to the evidence as offered by ap-pellee, there was only $6,311.00 due. Appellant filed a verified denial in which he alleged all the notes were usurious, and filed a cross-action. Appellant alleged that he had actually borrowed $49,002.00, and had paid back $51,948.00. He further alleged that because the notes were usurious, all the payments made…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Adleson v. B. F. Dittmar Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Federal Mortg. Co. v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  3. Federal Mortgage Co. v. State Nat. Bank of CorsicanaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  4. Moser v. John F. Buckner & SonsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
  5. Davis v. Federal Mortgage Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1938

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. A. B. Lewis Co. v. National Investment Corp. of HoustonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API