Legal Opinion

Schwendeman v. Marietta City Schools

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided January 31, 2020No. 2:18-cv-00588Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION JONATHAN SCHWENDEMAN, Case No. 2:18-CV-588 Plaintiff, JUDGE EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR. Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson v. MARIETTA CITY SCHOOLS, et ai., Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER The instant matter is before this Court for consideration of a joint Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 23) filed by Defendants Marietta City Schools, Will Hampton, and Darrell Primm (collectively, “Defendants”), Plaintiff Jonathan Schwendeman’s (“Plaintiff’) Brief in Opposition (ECF No. 31), and Defendants’ Response to Plaintiffs Brief in…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API